sexual politics in Chalker’s Soul Rider series

I’ve finished Jack Chalker’s five volume “Soul Rider” series and since, I’ve been obsessing more and more about issues of sex, gender and sexuality raised by the work.

So here we are on this amazing place called World. There are areas that are more or less like our planet where the “conventional” physical laws work: the Anchors. And there are areas surrounding these made of “pure Flux” in which machines and certain people by willpower alone can create anything from the Flux energy. That’s pretty neat if you can control the Flux, though most folks can’t and therefore they’re afraid of the stuff.

graffiti and Jack Chalker transform life: or is this what a New Human looks like?

The series starts out innocently enough in a charming communal farm in a pre-industrial village. Three childhood friends, Cassie, Dar and Suzl are about to come of age. Through various mishaps, they’re thrown into Flux with a number of other unfortunates. Then things really start to get wild.

Chalker makes a big point about people’s conscious and unconscious desires, emotions and wishes leading to physical and emotional changes in Flux. In “Birth,” Toby Haller makes love to his future wife, Mickey, in that medium. Their passionate desire is somehow converted into this life-long emotional bond that gets hardwired into the pair. They’re both content with the arrangement. Usually things don’t go quite so well.

In “Spirits,” Dar is captured by a sadistic wizard who has his genitals mutilated. Dar survives and eventually the wound is “magically” transformed into fully functioning female genitals. Later in the series, when Dar and Suzl try to have the “curse” lifted, the spell backfires and leads Suzl to develop a fully functioning, oversized set of male genitals. In “Masters,” we learn that Coydt van Haas has a similar “curse” in which he feels like a “man” but was involuntarily given magically created female genitals that he is unable to have changed back. The reactions of the three are telling. Both Dar and Coydt are overwhelmed with distress, shame and anger; yet Suzl accepts the change and just goes with it.

These partial transformations in Flux are strange. But that’s not all. There are numerous examples of folks being completely changed from one sex to the other. Toby and Mickey Haller’s super-great grandson, Mervyn, who identifies as male, will magically transform into a woman when it’s convenient for travel in Anchor. As a punishment for failing to act in a “manly way,” New Eden courts will have men transformed into “Fluxgirls:” super sexy, over-sexed women who are mentally just a little “slower” then the men folk. That’s what happens to Suzl’s husband, Weiz. (It’s so wrong that chief Justice Adam Tilghman orders the punishment then turns around and takes Suzl as his second wife!) It kind of backfires on the old boys in “Children” when Weiz-come-Ayesha starts the ball rolling for New Eden’s eventual destruction and containment. I guess forcing guys that you don’t like into literally becoming women is a male fantasy for the sexually and emotionally insecure. But it doesn’t look like a good idea, at least in hindsight.

I’ve been wondering, too, about the whole Fluxgirl/Fluxwife concept. Men impose this on women, most of the time against their will, which seems very troubling. Yet we see powerful female wizards and intelligent, liberated female scientists choose to become or remain Fluxgirls even when they don’t have to. Maybe some people are happy with the lifestyle? But why is it so one-sided? “Fluxdudes” would be pretty cool, too. And to be honest, sometimes I think that I wouldn’t mind that kind of thing myself. Weird.

Part of the problem with the Fluxgirl idea is the suggestion that these women are somehow inferior to their unchanged female and male counterparts. That’s why folks are appalled when Cassie voluntarily commits to becoming a Fluxwife and Connie in “Birth” transforms herself into “Kitten.” What does this really mean? What is Chalker intending us to think? Is someone “less-than” or perhaps “greater-than” living this simplified life of beauty, erotic satisfaction and contentment? I wonder. It seemed ideal in the Well World series when Nathan Brazil and Terry get trapped on the tropical island with their memories blocked. Later Brazil recalls the experience as one of the happiest in his very long life. Is that the message from Kitten and Cassie and even Morgaine? It’s better?

Major Verdugo in “Children” is eventually transformed from chauvinistic man into lovely passive woman, in what the female characters seem to imply is his just desserts. We’re led to believe that the Stringer, Matson, voluntarily submits to being changed into the likeness of his daughter, Sondra, so that he can train the women fighters of Suzl’s great army in “Children.” Though it turns out that it’s a trick and it was Sondra pretending to be Matson pretending to be Sondra. So Matson himself never becomes a woman. I can just hear him thinking, “Whew!” But what’s up with that?

I cannot really think of examples of women becoming men in the series beyond Sondra’s short-lived masquerade as her father. Yeah, sure, women take on elements of male anatomy, but it sort of stops there. Even Suzl’s “New Human,” a kind of hybrid man/woman that’s fully functional as both but is truly neither, looks more like a “regular woman,” apparently because the biology of pregnancy requires it, whatever that means. Honestly, Dar was menstruating in “Spirits” but looked like a guy. Why in the world can’t the New Human look whatever way in “Children?”

Coydt van Haas becomes the mastermind in the creation of the rigidly gender-stereotyped New Eden by collecting a group of powerful men that have been used as sex slaves by more powerful female wizards in Flux. They’re all seeking revenge against women, I suppose for their sense of humiliation. That revenge turns out simply to be imposing the opposite, equally troubling, though perhaps, more familiar system of women subservient to men, on the entire population of Anchor.

New Eden’s the whole reason that Suzl rounds up her army of volunteer and Flux-conscripted women in the first place. She wants to prevent the sexist culture from spreading to other Anchors and possibly to all of World. Yet are her methods any different? She insists that everyone be female or New Human, her single-sex “solution” to the problem of gender difference. Male sex is no obstacle as she simply has men magically changed into women, whether they want to or not.

With all of this sexual stuff, obviously these characters engage in the “real thing” too. Surprisingly, or maybe not, it’s usually heterosexual or same-sex lesbian style only. There are the occasional situations with the male character with the female genitals having sex with women (e.g. van Haas) or when a male-identified character with female genitals has sex with a female-identified character with male genitals (e.g. Dar and Suzl). To me these are just creative variations of heterosexuality.

The lesbian stuff is simply everywhere! In “Birth” with the computer-manipulated formation of the matriarchal Mother Church, woman-on-woman sex is even given a religious and spiritual basis and sanction. Yet where’s the guy-on-guy action?

Suzl briefly hooks up with a gay male Stringer. It’s when she looks like a woman but is blessed with ample male equipment. It’s convenient at the time for both of them, though not perfect. She prefers women; he likes men. Plus the whole deal’s on the down low, which is awkward. We hear her earnestly confide the arrangement and problems to a woman friend. She rationalizes it at the time with the thought that she needs protection in Flux, which her bf provides, and she offers sex more to his liking while allowing him to save face in the Stringer corps. It seems that there’s just no place for a gay Stringer. How Eighties!

What possible difference can it make who you sleep with in a place where anyone can look like anyone or anything? The only time romantic same-sex male relationships are noted is in “Masters” when Matson is sent as an envoy to New Eden. He stays overnight in a small town outside the capital and observes two New Eden men kissing passionately. He’s ‘tolerant’ but makes a big point of noting that other men expressing any interest in him would be unacceptable.

Most of the story is from the perspective of the female characters: Cassie, Suzl, Spirit and Morgaine. These women are written in a compassionate, real way that makes them seem like ‘whole’ people, rather than science fiction-style, two dimensional plastic dolls. I get the sense that Chalker genuinely likes these women. The series places women in powerful roles as heads of the Church, Saint-like religious crusaders, Army commanders, heads of internal security and powerful psychologists. During the Samish crisis with the opening of the Hellgates, we learn that more women than men have been selected by the Soul Riders and Guardians to control the Flux machinery to fight off the invading aliens. I have the idea that’s supposed to suggest that women are either more powerful than men in terms of Flux control or perhaps that they have more self-restraint and therefore are more fit for the power. Of course, Matson waltzes in to provide a battle plan for the ladies…

It’s also suggested several times throughout that men are more expendable than women, as you only need a few guys to carry on the tribe. My response to that is “puh-leese!” The only reason humans exist is to procreate? Give me a break!

So what’s it all mean? Is the Soul Rider series sexist, or heterosexist? Is it an attempt to rise above gender itself or is the point to demonstrate why that’s so impossible for us? Is it somehow related to contemporary Eighties stuff? Maybe Chalker didn’t want to push the envelope too far? I don’t know. I really like the guy and his crazy novels. And these gendered questions are one of the big reasons. Probably it doesn’t even matter, as the novels are all out of print and most likely I’m the only one reading this stuff anymore anyway.

If you are into the series, please contact me! I’d love to hear your thoughts.

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • missa Nov 18, 2010 @ 6:26

    You’re not the only one reading these books. Chalker is one of my favorites!
    I’ve often wondered what the deal was with the sexual identity issues, and the only answer I’ve come up with is that Chalker himself had a lot of questions. Perhaps he wanted to know how the other half lives, or simply wanted to point out that the male/female role is only a small part of who you are, though it has the ability to alter who you may become.
    It was more attitude and acceptance that got the characters through their situations, and if you think about it, you come to realize that the ones who had the biggest hangups with their sexual identity were the “bad guys”.

  • Stevie Nov 18, 2010 @ 10:27

    Missa

    Thank goodness that you’ve contacted me! I’ve been Chalker-obsessed for ages without anyone to comment about it with!

    I do think that you’re right to an extent that Chalkerian villains have more hang-ups about sexuality and, ultimately they seem to “pay for it” in the end. Though it is kind of striking that it is mainly “heroines” (at least in Flux and Anchor) that go through endless bodily transformations, degrading situations etc. while the “heros” sort of stay the same. Also to me it often seems one way: if a male character changes, he never becomes “male” again. Female characters can transiently become male or have male sexual characteristics but they are either a kind of “third sex” or female in a matter of thinking. Do you know what I mean?

    In some of the other series, you see more men changing to women and vice versa, though I still struggle to get a handle on what it means. Have you read the Well World trilogy that Chalker published in the Nineties? To me the whole book is about problems with oppression of women. At the very end, Nathan Brazil, who had never considered the issue seriously until his conversation with Mavra Chang in which she complains about how she was “stuck” at home with women in traditional ancient societies while Nathan went partying with the guys, makes that boo-boo and forgets to reset his human body back to a man and the last we see of him is he has become a woman from Miami or something–possibly for centuries to come. What do you think the message is here? Is Chalker teasing Brazil or what?

    What other Chalker novels do you enjoy? I’m reading book 2 of GOD, Inc. right now.

  • missa Nov 18, 2010 @ 11:24

    As of yet, I have read the Soul Rider Saga and the Well World Saga. I seriously want more.
    I found myself disappointed with a few of the male characters in both series- they seem rather 2-dimensional, and lack the ability to change, adapt and progress as well as their female counterpoints. Although Mervyn took on the look of a woman, he never really changed. I’m not sure he had the courage.
    I just finished re-reading Birth of Flux and Anchor, and found myself for the first time really thinking about the choice Connie made. I know I never could have done it, but I can see how it was thought out, and how it may be beneficial. I feel it equates to suicide, but…

    I love the way Chalker got psychology into everything. (at least everything I’ve read) and how even such fantastical stories relate to current society.
    I honestly thought my husband and I were his only fans anymore- no one knows what I’m talking about

  • Stevie Nov 18, 2010 @ 16:39

    Missa

    Of course you’re right about Mervyn, though his group is totally dedicated to prevention of the Hellgates re-openiing, and thereby maintainance of the status quo, so naturally, he’s not likely to change much.

    I was shocked by Connie’s transformation though part of me sort of envies it. As the new-her, she was very healthy, seemed content, had a long and apparently fulfilling life without much extra baggage. Not bad really. Certainly she lost the things that made her “Connie” in the bargain, which I suppose is why it doesn’t really work for most and why you feel like she committed “suicide.” Also, it helped that she lived in a fairly tolerant society, as her lifestyle might have branded her elsewhere. Actually, in some of the other Chalker series there are women that get transformed into similar types of characters. In the book I’m on now, GOD Inc. #2, Brandy Horowitz sort of transforms into a Connie-type but unfortunately is forced into prostitution, though I feel confident that she will find her way out of it soon. Chalker seems as preoccupied with these beautiful, schizoid, super-sexed women as much as he is with the paradasical Garden-of-Eden style islands as temporary respites.

    I think that you’re also right when you write that Chalker uses a lot of psychology. Another thing that I find fascinating about his books in general is that they’re not especially interested in empire building, war or the pursuit of power as an end in itself. That is refreshingly different from a lot of other writing in this genre.

    What did you think about the two Well World books without Marvra and Nathan Brazil that were underwater?

    I also really liked the Chalker fantasy series, the Dancing Gods. Have you read these?

  • KimQ Apr 23, 2013 @ 23:13

    Hello,

    I came across this page because I was searching for a plot synopsis of the Soul Rider series. I have read it through two or three times, but that was years ago and so a lot of the details are fuzzy for me now. Anyway, I still have a strange fascination with the series out of proportion to is general popularity. I’m not even sure if I can say I like the series, Scadenfreude probably descibes my response to the characters best. Which leads me to a somewhat uncomfortable examination of my own misanthropic/misandric characteristics and general questions of what justice/morality mean to me. I read the series first when I was a teenager and the explict sexuality was something that I had not had a lot of exposure to, so that was also one of the hooks to this series for me.

    The concept of the world itself is quite interesting. And from what i recall I was satisfied with the overall depth of the plot. It hangs together and doesn’t give oversimplified “disney” explanations, If it had I would have tossed it away in digust like the Star Wars prequel movies, (lol). The Soul Rider books still have a special place in my collection.

    So, was interesting to read you thoughts and comments on the novels. Thanks for putting them out there, Your not the only one fascinated by this series and the unconventional questions it strongly provokes. Being pollitically correct is sometimes necessary but it’s terribly boring.

    KimQ

  • John Oct 11, 2013 @ 10:16

    These books have been an obsession with me ever since I picked up my first copy of the Well World series in 1986. When I discovered that Jack Chalker had died a few years ago I was very sad and will miss that rush of excitment I always got when ever he published a new novel. I am convinced that in the right hands a film version of the ” Birth of Flux and Anchor ” could wind up to be an amazing television series. I love the whole story of Anatole Borelli and how through his subatomic studies he opened the way for mankind to go to distant galaxies and create custom made worlds and how self aware computers almost took over the planet. Though the politcal themes of the 80’s in this book have changed in our present time, I still love the hokie and nostalgic feel of the stories.
    With the death of Chalker our world has lost a great story teller but I will continue to reread his works and enjoy his ideas.

  • John Cowan Oct 27, 2013 @ 13:56

    In one of the Well World books, a female Entry (alien who’s been changed to a different species) who becomes male reflects on her experience by saying she’s learned two things: men make the rules in this society, and she is not one of those men. Chalker was a non-essentialist feminist: he believed that neither men nor women are inherently superior to the other. Furthermore, while hierarchical male domination is “natural” in the sense that it’s the way society tends to go unless women and “not those men” push back hard, “natural” is in no way to be equated with “good”. He reminds me of John Stuart Mill in “The Subjection of Women” (readily available online, or see the Wikipedia article).

  • Shmea Nov 18, 2015 @ 21:35

    I wonder what this says about chalker. Old guys being transformed into sexy young women is a theme that comes up into many of his books.