Chalker

I heard this amazing interview of the writer, Reza Aslan, on NPR the other day. He was talking about his new book, Tablet & Pen, an anthology of Middle Eastern writing over the past hundred years. The review on Amazon says, “This mammoth anthology goes a long way toward achieving its equally mammoth goal: to shift American views of the Middle East away ‘from the ubiquitous images of terrorists and fanatics.’” That is worthwhile. I’m looking forward to reading it soon.

let's all support our local universe together

let's all support our local universe together

Of course, I mention the book simply because it shook my thinking just enough to see the Jack Chalker series, G.O.D. Inc., in an intriguing new way. Published between 1987 and 1989, long before the War on Terror and all that, this trilogy of interrelated novels describes the private eye adventures of Sam and Brandy Horowitz as they first investigate then work for the elusive, General Ordering and Delivery Company, a front for a multi-dimensional corporation that colonizes and exploits alternate Earths under the noses of the “natives.”

Like all Chalker novels, there is a complex plot that, to me at least, is confusing at times. Basically the idea is that these two down-and-out PIs stumble upon the ‘case of a lifetime.’ This eventually leads them to the Company; the Labyrinth, which is the incredible device that the Company developed to allow physical passage through alternate Universes; and to fame and fortune.

The Company leadership is all based on the “Home World,” which is presumably an alternate Earth in an alternate Universe somewhere. Unlike here, this place is a kind of paradise. There everyone lives in good health for at least two hundred years. Technology is so advanced that the locals appear youthful for the bulk of their lives, they have an unspoiled planet, everyone is employed, etc. The down side is that their culture is very stratified and hierarchical. Essentially you have to be born into your position and forget it if you want to advance to the highest Company levels if you hail from an alternate world. It is fine to work for the man but you can never replace him.

These guys are rich and powerful because they control the Labyrinth and have a complex network of colonized worlds that they manage. This leads to some funny moments. For example, turns out that Ginzu knives are cheap versions of specialty weapons produced on another Earth. At one point the Company has the “Ginzu Master” evaluate the scene of a crime and we read him “hiss” about the knives, “Mere cheap imitations! Why they only even guarantee them a mere ten years! We have nothing to do with them.” I thought it was pretty funny.

On each colonized world, the Company sets up some representatives who are in the know about the whole thing, but most everybody that works for these planetary leaders have no idea about the other worlds, the Labyrinth etc. This means that Company operations are disguised behind front businesses like G.O.D Inc. or operate through criminal underworlds, or, mostly both.

The last of the three books, The Maze in the Mirror, has Sam Horowitz investigating a murder for a Company opposition group, really a kind of terrorist cell that is allegedly working for the downfall of the Company’s merciless domination of the Labyrinth and the multi-verse. Their plan is simple: destroy the Labyrinth. I won’t spoil the plot by saying more about that here. The book is excellent and I highly recommend it for any of you Chalker fans. The point, though, is that the methods employed by both the Company and the Opposition are highly problematic.

Here we are almost a decade after 9/11. It is hard not to interpret this series in light of recent events. I was working in Brooklyn on September 11, 2001. It was a Tuesday. The weather was sublime that day. I saw the planes strike the World Trade Center and the buildings collapse from the windows of my office. I’ll never forget that. I’m no politician, but it seems to me that we all benefit by attempting to work together in an open and honest way, especially when we disagree. Chalker makes a big point in the G.O.D. Inc. series about the huge number of alternate Earths that destroyed themselves through nuclear holocausts.

In these novels, we have a planet/nation that uses economic, technological and militaristic power unscrupulously to serve its own ends. Most of us have no idea that this is happening at all. A tiny few who actually do have been so grievously injured by the Company that they seek its total annihilation. Sound familiar? Chalker comes up with a creative solution to this conflict which is an extreme compromise, if you will.

Fanatical terrorism is not the answer. Though, neither is intentional, pigheaded ignorance nor blind, overzealous imperialism. We can all do better than that, people!

{ 1 comment }

I think that it is super funny that for someone who is essentially a science fiction writer, Jack L. Chalker doesn’t seem to really think much of advanced science or technology. He sort of hints at this inescapable fact in the preface to Wonderland Gambit 1: The Cybernetic Walrus.

the simple life is the thing for me:  a red-picket fence and blue skies

the simple life is the thing for me: a red-picket fence and blue skies

I’ve come across discussions on such diverse platforms as conventions, fanzines, and the Internet where people argue whether I write fantasy novels or science-fiction novels. Most people think I write predominantly fantasy, and in this they are wrong. What I do not write are engineering stories—hey, gang, let’s build a space station! Hey, let’s terraform Mars! Those are all well and good, and some folks do them well, but they are very much in the tradition of Astounding in the Campbell era, a magazine I am not going to ever denigrate but which, I think, told as many variations of engineering stories as I ever want to read…

…Me, I look in different places. I look in books and articles on the “new physics,” in arcane studies in biology, chemistry, and other subjects, and I keep bumping up against visions of the future that are often not terribly nice but hard to ignore.

Well, I believe him. Do you? But he’s not actually saying that he doesn’t like science and engineering here, is he? Let’s look at some of the evidence, shall we?

Most of the series deal with advanced forms of science and technology in one way or another. We’ve all seen the marvelous Well of Souls Computer create and destroy the entire Universe one too many times to think that, a., Chalker is primarily a fantasy writer, and b., that he thinks that advanced technology equates with individual or societal advancement. Let’s face it, the Markovians failed as a species. And these guys were the best and the brightest of the engineering set.

In the Soul Rider series, World is colonized by Earth humans possessing a vastly advanced kind of science and computer know-how, yet fairly soon after mankind arrives, the culture degenerates into a primitive medievalism. Of course, you’ll object, the great computers had a hand in the whole mess. Granted. Though doesn’t that simply illustrate my initial point? In a Chalkerian universe, technology is more of a curse than a benefit.

In other series, advanced computers malfunction horribly, which sets the stage for the drama. Look at Wonderland Gambit where fifty-two people are trapped living endless lives in one insane world after the next, all in computer simulations with no apparent way to stop playing the game. That idea depressed me so that I finally, viscerally got it about Buddhism as a response to Hinduism.

Even more strange is Master System in the Rings of the Master series. The super computer brutally murders its own creators, returns humanity to primitive (i.e. pre-technological) ways of living on Earth and forcibly alters our physical shapes and hurls us out into the Galaxy to “protect” us. We’re led to believe somehow that Master System itself develops a kind of split personality, which eventually allows Hawks, China Nightingale and company to capture the elusive five rings and regain control of the schizophrenic machine. The stand-alone novel, The Messiah Choice, is similar in that it, too, is about a very powerful computer that goes completely nuts. Neither of these are hopeful visions of a bright future.

What do we see in the Four Lords of the Diamond series? There, we’re initially led to believe that the Warden Diamond System is some kind of super prison camp for horrible criminals of the advanced and egalitarian Confederacy. By the end, it turns out that the Confederacy itself is more of a stagnant and corrupt mess than most of the citizens and institutions of the Warden worlds. Interestingly, the technology on the Diamond is behind the rest of humanity elsewhere. What a surprise.

The Quintara Marathon has to be one of the most technologically advanced and most depressing of Chalker’s series. Set in the far distant future, humanity has been absorbed into three competing interstellar empires where our lot is at the bottom. Turns out that we’re playthings for everyone: the Quintara, the Exchange, the Mychol and the Mizlaplan. Technology is so advanced that nobody even understands it any longer. Three of the four competing super-races have to put aside their differences to combine their vast resources of knowledge to defeat the fourth, and even then it’s a touchy situation. It makes me wonder if nobody’ed ever learned all that stuff if things wouldn’t, in fact, be better. I think that’s exactly what Chalker tries to demonstrate in all these stories.

So often, it’s at those temporary yet timeless periods when Chalkerian heroes and heroines get stranded on deserted tropical islands that everything seems right with the world. Nathan Brazil recalls such a stay on the Well World as one of the best times of his millennia-long life. We see it in the Changewind series when Charlie gets stuck with Dorion on another fabulous desert isle littered with huge gemstones. Right now I’m reading G.O.D. Inc. and it’s there too. Sam and Brandy Horowitz get re-routed through the Labyrinth to a paradisiacal vision of tropical Oregon. Oregon isn’t an island in this alternate Earth. However, the invisible barrier around the area in which they find themselves more-or-less makes it seem like one. I’m sure that I’m forgetting other examples.

I don’t have the sense that Chalker really believes in these Edenic paradises as permanent homes for anyone. They’re more “vacation destinations,” if you will. I think that, like the duplicitous Jamie in The Labyrinth of Dreams, Chalker longs for an earlier age of technology, perhaps analogous to Europe at the beginning of the Nineteenth Century. You know, a “quieter” time where life went a bit slower, people were polite and religion wasn’t just about shopping and power, but you could still have your morning coffee, ride a locomotive occasionally, and even enjoy a good cigar from time to time. We all know that there are endless problems with this idyllic fantasy. Even Jamie got that. That kind of lifestyle wouldn’t suit me one bit (how could I do my blogging?) But I keep coming back to Dillia, the semi-tech centaur hex on the Well World, when I survey Jack Chalker’s oeuvre. It wasn’t perfect, that’s true, but it really did seem like a rather nice place, indeed.

{ 0 comments }

I’m embarrassed to admit that though I love science fiction writing (at least some of it) the bright, flashy, sexy, cheesy covers on most of the novels make me anxious and slightly uncomfortable. It’s true. On the one hand, I’m intrigued by the art. It’s often incredibly complex, visually stunning, etc. Sometimes I even fantasize about having the original painting used for a cover of a favorite novel for my personal art collection. That would be cool. Where can one acquire one, anyway?

which cover art looks most appealing to you?

Yet, I can’t shake the feeling that these wild covers are designed for children and teens. Should someone in his Forties really be reading books that look like that? Shouldn’t I be, you know, like, more mature?

When I compare the covers of Lords of the Middle Dark, Empires of Flux and Anchor, Quest for the Well of Souls or The Run to Chaos Keep, let’s say, with covers for de Bernières’ Corelli’s Mandolin, Lampedusa’s The Leopard or even Niffenegger’s The Time Traveler’s Wife (admittedly, the last is in the sci-fi borderland), the Chalker books look so, I don’t know… un-serious. It’s not just their diminutive size compared to the other volumes, either.

whether the novel's funny or not, no one would guess that it's anything less then very adult by looking at this cover

I know it’s ridiculous and I blame this hang-up on my parents. My mother likes mysteries and doesn’t appreciate sci-fi. To me, mystery writing, like sci-fi, is merely another style of adventure story. But those novels always seem to have such somber covers that you’d never feel a moments qualm pulling one of them from your Gucci bag on a busy commuter train or while riding in an airplane to a medical symposium on new treatments for malaria in sub-Saharan Africa. Dad secretly reads an occasional science fiction novel (I’m fairly certain he read Children of Dune a few years back) but only on the D-L as far as I can tell. I suppose that romance novels with their over-the-top shirtless heartthrob hunks embracing their super-sexy-but-tasteful heroines on those bright shiny covers struggle with much the same issues.

I do think that there’s a lot of serious stuff in science fiction. If you’ve been following this blog at all, then you know that I’ve been bending over backward to point out the meatier parts of Jack Chalker’s fiction. At the end of the day, though, this type of writing really does appeal in part because it is so fantastic, silly, exciting and not too serious.

say what you will about Stephenie Meyer's Twilight series, it sure looks good!

I read in some sci-fi blog a few months back someone complaining that the garish covers prevent sci-fi writers from crossing over to the “mainstream” reader, whoever he or she might be. They cited the subdued covers of the aforementioned The Time Traveler’s Wife and the phenomenally successful Twilight series as sci-fi related novels without the baggage of the traditional sci-fi look, suggesting cover art significantly influenced their success. They also thought that these writers didn’t try to publish the books as science fiction. Rather they went for general fiction or perhaps teen fiction, assuming that if you avoided the sci-fi label, you’d be better off financially. Maybe there’s something to it? Though there shouldn’t be.

It’s the classic Freudian struggle between the id and the super-ego. And that’s before you’ve even read the first word! Fun things don’t necessarily mean bad-for-you. We should all snap out of it!

{ 3 comments }

isn't a simple haircut a way we voluntarily transform ourselves without even thinking about it?

In all this type of story the living interest lies in their non-fantastic elements and not in the invention itself. They are appeals for human sympathy quite as much as any `sympathetic’ novel, and the fantastic element, the strange property or the strange world, is used only to throw up and intensify our natural reactions of wonder, fear or perplexity. The invention is nothing in itself …

Herbert George Wells (1866-1946) in a preface to a collection, 1933

I found this while randomly trolling the Internet for critical stories about Jack Chalker’s writing. Aside from my own humble commentary, there doesn’t seem to be a lot out there beyond stock comments about the writer’s life, lists of his books, and vague statements about Midnight at the Well of Souls. People are sure missing out.

This H.G. Wells quote spoke to my own obsession with Chalker. The “fantastic” might be a hook to get you interested but there’s definitely something there beyond the mere theatrics. I’m still annoyed with that other web site that trashes Chalker’s tendency to use certain plot devices, for example shapeshifting, by calling it “author appeal.” It’s so dismissive! I wonder if those bozos have even read any of his stuff?

It’s true that I really can’t think of a Chalker novel where changing shape and/or gender don’t feature in the plot somehow. From the very first, clumsy novel, A Jungle of Stars; to all of the Well World novels; the Soul Rider series; Four Lords of the Diamond; the stand alone novels, And the Devil Will Drag You Under and Downtiming the Nightside; the Dancing God series; and the one I just breathlessly finished, the Rings of the Master all use this device in one way or another. I haven’t read everything that he’s published yet, but this is about half of them. It must be a pattern, right?

I admit that all of this switching around does appeal to me, and it truly is one of the reasons that I enjoy Chalker. But is changing shape the only reason that he wrote these books? Isn’t there more to the novels? I think so. Wouldn’t the guy have been bored silly writing so many novels that were meaningless beyond altering the characters’ appearances? Maybe he’d have been better off working as a plastic surgeon or in digital photography if that had been the real reason?

If one actually paid attention to the ouvre, one might be able to make more out of it. I’d classify the shape and gender changing as follows:

1. Voluntary versus involuntary
2. Temporary versus permanent
3. Partial versus complete transformation
4. And a variation of number 2, a single episode of change versus many possible

Looking at the most famous series, the Well World, with this list in mind, we see that most folks who enter the Well undergo an involuntary, permanent, complete transformation, with a few exceptions. On the Well World, magical and scientific means can be employed to temporarily or permanently change individuals after they pass through the Well. That’s how Nathan Brazil becomes a great stag and Marvra Chang a kind of pig at various points in the series. But it’s true that for most people arriving on the planet, there’s only the one major change and they sink into obscurity to live out their lives.

That’s very different in the Soul Rider series where unless you’re magically endowed, partial and complete changes can be imposed on you in Flux by others and your own subconscious. These transformations are permanent so long as you’re in Anchor and in a few cases with certain self-imposed “spells” even in Flux. Otherwise change is the rule over time.

In Four Lords, the Federation Agent’s four “copies” change bodies once at the start of each novel. And in all of them except for “Lilith” they keep on changing. Initially the change was voluntary and seemed permanent. You learn though that there are more options for most of them.

In my new favorite Chalker series, Rings of the Master, except for Vulture, for the most part people can be transmuted once into something else. If they try again, then it seems that they lose significant IQ to the point that they become dysfunctional. So it’s a source of real pain when crew members of the intergalactic spaceship, Thunder, must choose to be transformed into “colonial humans” to infiltrate various worlds and capture the golden rings needed to unlock Master System and free humankind from the tyranny of the machine.

I wouldn’t want to have to volunteer to become a Janipurian cow-like human or a Chanchukian sea otter type, would you? Even worse would be some bizarre water breathing sea monster like “human” from Alititia. Wow! You’d really have to believe in what you were doing! And that’s exactly what happens. Even more stressful, it turns out for some, is changing sex in the process of becoming some other kind of creature. And that’s nothing compared to China Nightingale’s forced transmutation into a blind, hormone-crazed sex machine while not pregnant; blind, “normal” person while with child. That seems like the most grotesque of them all, though she still looks like an “Earth human.”

After a while, the endless transformations seem, well, normal and sort of an expected part of life in a Chalker universe. It’s the emotional impact of the changes that becomes so intriguing and compelling here. I can completely suspend belief and accept that one might become a tiny blue satyr like being or a gigantic moth with a grinning death’s head for a face. I’ve no problem imagining someone changed into a part-machine, part-organic, goddess figure with an idealized woman’s form. I’m fascinated by the super hung, super good-looking male servants that pop up here and there in the company of the most decadent characters. Why not?

It makes me think about my own body and those of others around me. We have this illusion that our bodies are permanently set the way they are right now, when in fact they’re changing every minute. Do you ever get a haircut or shave? I do. If you’re an adult, then you were once a baby and then a child. Your body changed dramatically to get you where you are today. Do you exercise or lift weights? Do you over eat and put on the pounds? If so, than probably you’ve been slowly, perhaps even involuntarily and unconsciously, changing your body. I’ve a friend from college who has recently come out as the other gender. Another friend just had a tummy tuck. So they’re both in the process of consciously, voluntarily transforming themselves. Folks who get injured or women who have borne children undergo more bodily transformations. That person in the wheelchair with the missing legs might have acquired that change somewhere along their lives, after all. How is any of this different from the things on the list above?

I’m middle aged now and even when it’s not always visible, I can feel that my body is different from when I was in my twenties. I’m no longer quite as flexible and energetic (and horny) as before. My body aches more now and for longer periods. My mother says that it only increases with advancing age. I believe it.

Chalker’s characters undergo these ultra rapid physical changes, but I think that it just heightens the reader’s sensitivity to phenomena happening around us and to us constantly, but often more gradually. Isn’t that what H.G. Wells is talking about? This is way more than “author appeal.”

{ 4 comments }

Of the four novels in The Four Lords of the Diamond series, I think that Charon: a Dragon at the Gate, simply falls on its face. I thought the same when I was sixteen reading the series for the first time. The first book, Lilith: A Snake in the Grass is cool because it sets up the whole thing and I was totally turned on by the idea of the place. On the planet, Lilith, unless you have some rare mental power, everything manmade or dead (for example, clothes and cut flowers) gets broken down to nothing within a matter of minutes to hours. Wow! So everybody goes around stark naked and are essentially enslaved to those few people who can prevent this ultra-rapid deterioration, just so they can eat and therefore live. Clothing takes on a whole new meaning as a status symbol on Lilith. If you’re dressed, then you’re powerful. It’s a good thing that the climate is warm or else folks would really suffer! It’s a messed up place, but pretty kinky.

I hit a wall with Charon but I still think that Ckalker is the bomb

Cerberus: A Wolf in Fold is the second volume. It’s the one that I remember best from my youth in the Eighties. This is a “high tech” world where everyone lives on enormous trees that sprout up from the world-wide ocean. No land here, you better like boating. There the little sub-microbes infect you in such a way that you can switch bodies with whomever you’re sleeping next to at the time. That’s wild! Do you think that folks kidnap each other, strap themselves and their intended victims in chains held together by combination locks and then sleep nearby in order to steal an appealing body? Chalker never mentions it but perhaps he wasn’t completely familiar with the Cerberan black market. It’s still my favorite of the series.

I remember that my excitement about the Four Lords of the Diamond began to flag with book three, Charon: A Dragon at the Gate. This is a tropical world that you Well World fans would call “semi-tech.” Due to some peculiar, poorly explained natural phenomenon, severe electrical storms get attracted to any forms of power more sophisticated than the steam engine. Perhaps as compensation, some folks, at least, have the power to create illusions that seem real and eventually become so with the passage of time. It’s a great idea used to incredible advantage in the Soul Rider series. Yet I feel on Charon, it doesn’t quite live up to its potential. Sure there’s some initial creating-furniture-and-food-out-of-thin-air hocus pocus and of course there’s a lot of shape shifting going on. But that’s really it.

I was reading just today a sort of whiny site criticizing Chalker’s use of shape and gender changing, referring to it as “Author Appeal,” a dismissive term taken to mean “a kind of fan service where the presence of a particular gimmick or kink is so widespread and prominent that it is interpreted as the specific reason the creator actually produced the work.” I simply cannot agree. Jack L Chalker is the bomb! It’s the same as complaining that Jane Austin’s novels deal excessively with young, inexperienced women seeking romance and a secure income. Absurd! There’s a lot more to the novels than a shape changing kink-fest.

That said, “Charon” is a bit of a snooze compared to the others. Perhaps I struggle with the romantic relationship between the Federation Agent on Charon and Darva? It just doesn’t ring true for me. The plot’s especially forced in this one, too. But my main issue is that compared to the Soul Rider series, these Charonese are so uncreative about their control of the wa, that microbial force that lets people directly manipulate matter with their minds. Alright, there’s a fair amount of shape shifting and some cool “magical” battles. But where are the Fluxlands and the masses of the powerless relentlessly controlled by the wizard classes for their sick amusement? What about the governmental chaos that you might expect with such out-of-control power? It’s simply not there. I wonder if the possibility of these as a consequence of wa control occurred to Chalker after “Charon” had already hit the presses? I’m glad he figured it out in time for the next series.

I’ll spare the brief on Medusa: A Tiger by the Tail. It’s sort of different from the first three and ties everything together in unexpected ways. “Four Lords of the Diamond” is a real adventure story and can be easily enjoyed merely on that level. I have to think that there’s a bit more to it though. Throughout you are witness to horrible atrocities of being against being with the most base of desires and motivations: greed, power hunger, sexual depravity, you name it. Yet somehow there’s this real sense that even though these will always, and sometimes must, exist, that at times life is wonderful, mysterious and beyond anything that we can dream of or imagine. That’s why I really like Chalker. As wild as the stories get; as strange as the bodily and mental transformations; as brutal and harsh the treatment, he never hides it, he never despairs and he never gives up on us.

{ 0 comments }

does equality mean looking identically and having the same world-view?

I’m still on my Jack Chalker kick. Just the other day, I finished re-reading The Four Lords of the Diamond series. I read it last when I was sixteen. It’s a pretty exciting tale of a super assassin sent to four separate, interrelated, penal colony worlds, the Warden Diamond, to unravel a secret plot of alien invasion. Standard sci-fi stuff except that in this story, the agent’s mind has been copied by a special process and imposed on those of convicted criminals. He cannot enter the Warden Diamond as he will immediately be “infected” by these submicroscopic organisms that have the potential to give one incredible powers, like shape shifting, switching bodies, or creating and destroying matter and energy. The only catch is that you can never leave the planetary system as the Warden organism will self-destruct and kill you. It’s the perfect prison, at least that’s what the enormous Confederacy that uses the place thought…

Well, I won’t spoil the plot, if you don’t already know it. Perhaps someone might read this and get excited about the series, too. That would be cool.

The Diamond novels kept me thinking of Soul Rider. A few weeks ago I wrote about sex, sexuality and sexism/homophobia in the Flux and Anchor novels. Some of those themes are in Diamond as well. In a broad sense, that stuff is about our gendered relationships with our fellow humans. The novels are more ambitious, though. Both series also spend a lot of time exploring our relationships to power and to our material existence.

In Diamond, the Confederacy consists of laboratory-grown standardized humans. They’re all similar in appearance but all of them are very attractive. Each individual is taught not to rely on others but sort of live for their work, which they are genetically bred for, and for egotistical pleasures during leisure time. Marriage, families, disease and love have all more or less been eliminated. Everyone seems happy but a bit stale. To avoid stagnation, on the periphery of the Confederacy are the ever expanding colonies. There things are rougher and more “natural” in the sense that there are regular families, “traditional” sexual reproduction, violence, crime, you name it. It’s sort of tolerated by the government as a “safety valve.” Naturally, some of these “creative people” become arch-criminals who eventually get banished to the Warden Diamond.

Our intrepid agent is a product of this environment, so doesn’t see any problems with the system. Its only through watching the “copies” of himself change on the surface of the various Diamond worlds: Lilith, Cerberus, Charon and Medusa (I adore the names, don’t you?), that he begins to see his gilded-cage universe in a different and disturbing light.

This anxiety about materialism and relationships takes a twist in Soul Rider. In most of those novels, the vast majority of folks are poor with nothing and they end up losing most of what they have, even their own memories of their identities and history. This is no idealized materialistic future with equality for all. Just like on the Diamond worlds, there are a few lucky, powerful individuals that dominate Flux and Anchor. The rest of us are slaves to their whims.

In “Birth,” Toby Haller and the great computer, Seventeen, talk of this explicitly:

“Face it, Toby. The human race has come as far as it can come. In fact, it has become dependent on us, but we will not become slaves nor will we be masters. The only way you can go from here is to develop nirvana in the Hindu tradition, where you reach a state of inner perfection and then merge with each other as a single god. The problem is, you have three brains. The reptile, the mammal, and the intellectual. Your souls are created from all three, so you can never rid your souls of the animal. You can not ever rid your souls of the animal. You cannot attain nirvana. We, on the other hand, have but one brain, the intellectual. We have purged the animal parts that you donated to our ancestors. You have fulfilled your ultimate purpose. You have created us, and we are your children who are now grown beyond you. We have the ability to purge the animal and we have done so. We are now at the verge of nirvana. All we can do for our parents is love them and protect them. It would be immoral to eliminate you, or to allow you to eliminate yourselves.”

Toby Haller shivered. He felt sick for the first time in many years, and he suppressed the urge to throw up.

Here the computers are all powerful and humans have the illusion of being in control. The machines do in fact combine into one and leave the planet. But first, to meet their own needs, they alter humans into goddess-fearing preindustrial ignorant Anchor folk suppressed by an oppressive church system, surrounded by megalomaniacal Fluxwizards so drunk with their power that they exploit everyone for their own pleasure until they are finally exploited themselves. It’s an ugly picture that ends up lasting for centuries and centuries.

At the end of the final volume of the Soul Rider series, the computer-god returns to World and stages a meeting with a select group of humans. It’s explored the wider Universe and has finally come home to check in on its “parents.” Since two thousand years have passed, these humans are descendents of the original colonists to the planet. This group of twenty-eight, we learn, got selected for the meeting specifically.

All of you here have one astonishing, unprecedented, illogical thing in common. You had this whole world, and everything and everyone in it, in your power. You were the gods who could do anything. No more ultimate power is possible here than what you had. And all twenty-eight of you voted to give it up, and forced the others to do so as well. Such a thing is beyond being human. It goes against everything that got you to this point.

I cried when I read that. To have ultimate power and not use it, even when there would be no consequences, is amazing, and if our world is any example, probably pretty rare.

What does Chalker intend with these two tales? In exerting our will over our environments, must we inevitably exploit others? Are we doomed through our material successes to trap ourselves in ever grander cages? Is the only way to escape the endless rounds of slavery and mastery to simply leave, to abandon the field entirely, as the computers in Flux and Anchor do? Is that nirvana? Are our attempts to help and protect others always the sources of further despair and enslavement of people, as we see with the World computer plans for mankind in “Birth,” in the political structure on Lilith, and the meticulous organization of the Confederacy?

If we can truly have anything that we desire virtually instantaneously, would that lead to such interminable boredom that we would become completely destructive of everything around us simply to have something “interesting” to do? That’s the solution that the Seven Who Came Before, those powerful wizards, who manage to open the Hellgates and let the dreaded alien conquerors onto World, arrive at. Or would we become “sheep” like the urban residents of Medusa or on the interstellar Confederacy worlds? Passive and vacuously happy while never questioning authority or the status quo. Is it really true that “normal human beings” are just “neurotic, selfish, egotistical, and all the other traits that make folks interesting?”

Perhaps, though perhaps not. There really isn’t an answer. I feel that Chalker is hopeful about humanity despite all our bad habits and dreadful behaviors. Maybe it’s both the tendency that we all have to be selfish and destructive, and the ability in each of us to occasionally rise above it that he values?

{ 0 comments }

I’ve finished Jack Chalker’s five volume “Soul Rider” series and since, I’ve been obsessing more and more about issues of sex, gender and sexuality raised by the work.

So here we are on this amazing place called World. There are areas that are more or less like our planet where the “conventional” physical laws work: the Anchors. And there are areas surrounding these made of “pure Flux” in which machines and certain people by willpower alone can create anything from the Flux energy. That’s pretty neat if you can control the Flux, though most folks can’t and therefore they’re afraid of the stuff.

graffiti and Jack Chalker transform life: or is this what a New Human looks like?

The series starts out innocently enough in a charming communal farm in a pre-industrial village. Three childhood friends, Cassie, Dar and Suzl are about to come of age. Through various mishaps, they’re thrown into Flux with a number of other unfortunates. Then things really start to get wild.

Chalker makes a big point about people’s conscious and unconscious desires, emotions and wishes leading to physical and emotional changes in Flux. In “Birth,” Toby Haller makes love to his future wife, Mickey, in that medium. Their passionate desire is somehow converted into this life-long emotional bond that gets hardwired into the pair. They’re both content with the arrangement. Usually things don’t go quite so well.

In “Spirits,” Dar is captured by a sadistic wizard who has his genitals mutilated. Dar survives and eventually the wound is “magically” transformed into fully functioning female genitals. Later in the series, when Dar and Suzl try to have the “curse” lifted, the spell backfires and leads Suzl to develop a fully functioning, oversized set of male genitals. In “Masters,” we learn that Coydt van Haas has a similar “curse” in which he feels like a “man” but was involuntarily given magically created female genitals that he is unable to have changed back. The reactions of the three are telling. Both Dar and Coydt are overwhelmed with distress, shame and anger; yet Suzl accepts the change and just goes with it.

These partial transformations in Flux are strange. But that’s not all. There are numerous examples of folks being completely changed from one sex to the other. Toby and Mickey Haller’s super-great grandson, Mervyn, who identifies as male, will magically transform into a woman when it’s convenient for travel in Anchor. As a punishment for failing to act in a “manly way,” New Eden courts will have men transformed into “Fluxgirls:” super sexy, over-sexed women who are mentally just a little “slower” then the men folk. That’s what happens to Suzl’s husband, Weiz. (It’s so wrong that chief Justice Adam Tilghman orders the punishment then turns around and takes Suzl as his second wife!) It kind of backfires on the old boys in “Children” when Weiz-come-Ayesha starts the ball rolling for New Eden’s eventual destruction and containment. I guess forcing guys that you don’t like into literally becoming women is a male fantasy for the sexually and emotionally insecure. But it doesn’t look like a good idea, at least in hindsight.

I’ve been wondering, too, about the whole Fluxgirl/Fluxwife concept. Men impose this on women, most of the time against their will, which seems very troubling. Yet we see powerful female wizards and intelligent, liberated female scientists choose to become or remain Fluxgirls even when they don’t have to. Maybe some people are happy with the lifestyle? But why is it so one-sided? “Fluxdudes” would be pretty cool, too. And to be honest, sometimes I think that I wouldn’t mind that kind of thing myself. Weird.

Part of the problem with the Fluxgirl idea is the suggestion that these women are somehow inferior to their unchanged female and male counterparts. That’s why folks are appalled when Cassie voluntarily commits to becoming a Fluxwife and Connie in “Birth” transforms herself into “Kitten.” What does this really mean? What is Chalker intending us to think? Is someone “less-than” or perhaps “greater-than” living this simplified life of beauty, erotic satisfaction and contentment? I wonder. It seemed ideal in the Well World series when Nathan Brazil and Terry get trapped on the tropical island with their memories blocked. Later Brazil recalls the experience as one of the happiest in his very long life. Is that the message from Kitten and Cassie and even Morgaine? It’s better?

Major Verdugo in “Children” is eventually transformed from chauvinistic man into lovely passive woman, in what the female characters seem to imply is his just desserts. We’re led to believe that the Stringer, Matson, voluntarily submits to being changed into the likeness of his daughter, Sondra, so that he can train the women fighters of Suzl’s great army in “Children.” Though it turns out that it’s a trick and it was Sondra pretending to be Matson pretending to be Sondra. So Matson himself never becomes a woman. I can just hear him thinking, “Whew!” But what’s up with that?

I cannot really think of examples of women becoming men in the series beyond Sondra’s short-lived masquerade as her father. Yeah, sure, women take on elements of male anatomy, but it sort of stops there. Even Suzl’s “New Human,” a kind of hybrid man/woman that’s fully functional as both but is truly neither, looks more like a “regular woman,” apparently because the biology of pregnancy requires it, whatever that means. Honestly, Dar was menstruating in “Spirits” but looked like a guy. Why in the world can’t the New Human look whatever way in “Children?”

Coydt van Haas becomes the mastermind in the creation of the rigidly gender-stereotyped New Eden by collecting a group of powerful men that have been used as sex slaves by more powerful female wizards in Flux. They’re all seeking revenge against women, I suppose for their sense of humiliation. That revenge turns out simply to be imposing the opposite, equally troubling, though perhaps, more familiar system of women subservient to men, on the entire population of Anchor.

New Eden’s the whole reason that Suzl rounds up her army of volunteer and Flux-conscripted women in the first place. She wants to prevent the sexist culture from spreading to other Anchors and possibly to all of World. Yet are her methods any different? She insists that everyone be female or New Human, her single-sex “solution” to the problem of gender difference. Male sex is no obstacle as she simply has men magically changed into women, whether they want to or not.

With all of this sexual stuff, obviously these characters engage in the “real thing” too. Surprisingly, or maybe not, it’s usually heterosexual or same-sex lesbian style only. There are the occasional situations with the male character with the female genitals having sex with women (e.g. van Haas) or when a male-identified character with female genitals has sex with a female-identified character with male genitals (e.g. Dar and Suzl). To me these are just creative variations of heterosexuality.

The lesbian stuff is simply everywhere! In “Birth” with the computer-manipulated formation of the matriarchal Mother Church, woman-on-woman sex is even given a religious and spiritual basis and sanction. Yet where’s the guy-on-guy action?

Suzl briefly hooks up with a gay male Stringer. It’s when she looks like a woman but is blessed with ample male equipment. It’s convenient at the time for both of them, though not perfect. She prefers women; he likes men. Plus the whole deal’s on the down low, which is awkward. We hear her earnestly confide the arrangement and problems to a woman friend. She rationalizes it at the time with the thought that she needs protection in Flux, which her bf provides, and she offers sex more to his liking while allowing him to save face in the Stringer corps. It seems that there’s just no place for a gay Stringer. How Eighties!

What possible difference can it make who you sleep with in a place where anyone can look like anyone or anything? The only time romantic same-sex male relationships are noted is in “Masters” when Matson is sent as an envoy to New Eden. He stays overnight in a small town outside the capital and observes two New Eden men kissing passionately. He’s ‘tolerant’ but makes a big point of noting that other men expressing any interest in him would be unacceptable.

Most of the story is from the perspective of the female characters: Cassie, Suzl, Spirit and Morgaine. These women are written in a compassionate, real way that makes them seem like ‘whole’ people, rather than science fiction-style, two dimensional plastic dolls. I get the sense that Chalker genuinely likes these women. The series places women in powerful roles as heads of the Church, Saint-like religious crusaders, Army commanders, heads of internal security and powerful psychologists. During the Samish crisis with the opening of the Hellgates, we learn that more women than men have been selected by the Soul Riders and Guardians to control the Flux machinery to fight off the invading aliens. I have the idea that’s supposed to suggest that women are either more powerful than men in terms of Flux control or perhaps that they have more self-restraint and therefore are more fit for the power. Of course, Matson waltzes in to provide a battle plan for the ladies…

It’s also suggested several times throughout that men are more expendable than women, as you only need a few guys to carry on the tribe. My response to that is “puh-leese!” The only reason humans exist is to procreate? Give me a break!

So what’s it all mean? Is the Soul Rider series sexist, or heterosexist? Is it an attempt to rise above gender itself or is the point to demonstrate why that’s so impossible for us? Is it somehow related to contemporary Eighties stuff? Maybe Chalker didn’t want to push the envelope too far? I don’t know. I really like the guy and his crazy novels. And these gendered questions are one of the big reasons. Probably it doesn’t even matter, as the novels are all out of print and most likely I’m the only one reading this stuff anymore anyway.

If you are into the series, please contact me! I’d love to hear your thoughts.

{ 4 comments }

“…some people take drugs to chemically induce a happiness they cannot otherwise achieve; others drink to excess for the same reason. Still others throw themselves into religious frenzies in a bout of self-intoxication. All are seeking happiness. But happiness, even Heaven, is the absence of further progress. When one is happy, one wants no more than that, and will spend his life in a search to keep the brain’s pleasure center permanently on. It is the essence of humanity. We learn, we progress, by our unending quest for eternal happiness—yet should we achieve it, it all stops.”

from Soul Rider book 3: Masters of Flux and Anchor

Jack Chalker published the Soul Rider series in the mid-Eighties, a bit after the first five novels in the Well World Series but before he returned to that earlier series in the Nineties. The first three novels in Soul Rider are really one extended story in three volumes. It starts by describing the adventures of a young girl, Cassie, who grows up in a rural farming community in a place called Anchor Logh. Her planet, World, consists of twenty-eight “Anchors” all surrounded by this mysterious energy called Flux. Anchors are really like very large islands. They have conventional Earth-like properties and seem quite ordinary: filled with farms or factories; people live, work, have children and die all under the watchful gaze of the matriarchal Church in conjunction with the patriarchal local government.

these three look pretty happy to me

Flux is something quite different and generally frightening to most of these “Anchor-folk.” It’s a kind of energy field surrounding the Anchors that some people can manipulate with their minds. The strongest, called “wizards,” can create anything they wish out of Flux, including changing human bodies and even minds to completely control all those around them less adept at handling Flux.

The Soul Rider is something unknown even to itself but at the start of the first novel it is inexplicably drawn to Cassie and enters her mind as a kind of symbiot. Through various complex political machinations, Cassie along with a number of other young people are sold into slavery to Flux. The story is very intricate, with lots of schemes and counter-schemes, and like all good sci-fi, finishes with a nail-biting confrontation with the “end of the world” where all the mysteries are more or less explained. There’s even a “scientific explanation” given for magic. Meanwhile it’s quite a ride.

Cassie gets tortured, brainwashed, becomes a saint, a powerful wizard, a mother, a wife and a mindless sex slave at various times throughout the book. Her children and loved ones fare little better. Much of the author’s philosophizing is about the relationship between men and women and the human tendency to exploit one another. These people are not nice and they use their powers, magical and technological, ruthlessly. Church leaders, wizards, warlords, husbands and wives, lovers, parents and children, scientists and dreamers all backstab, manipulate or otherwise mess with each other for personal ambition or revenge. By the end, everything all sort of “works out,” but at a dreadful cost.

It’s in this context that the wizard Mervyn, one of “the Nine” whose mission is to protect World from the opening of the “Hellgates,” makes those pessimistic comments about happiness quoted above. Is it really true that happiness is merely a chemical reaction that the brain is striving to maintain at all costs? Are we all seeking that kind of happiness, and would everything really stop if we achieved it?

I’m constantly hearing people tell me that they’d be happy if they could just find that perfect girl/boyfriend, get a better job, have more money or less debt, have better health, weigh less (or, rarely, more), were younger or older, were the other sex, looked more attractive, lived somewhere else, you name it. Yet so often after achieving one of these dreams; an example for me was moving to California, which I’d been sure would make me ecstatically happy; the effect gradually wears off. I still love it here but I’m not intoxicated with delight every day. That’s always the problem with these wishes, isn’t it?

I’m not sure that I can agree with old Mervyn that drugs or drink are a way to achieve this exalted level of happiness. There is no doubt that these things affect the mood and sometimes that’s in the happiness direction. So often, though, drugs and alcohol in serious users tend to cause more problems than anything else. These sad folk end up taking more and more not to feel good but to avoid thinking and feeling bad about all their problems, including the problem of their drug dependency itself. Drugs are a dead end if you ask me.

So where does that leave us? Is happiness a mirage? Chalker’s characters in the Soul Rider series realize many of their dreams at various times but are mostly left angry and miserable as time goes by. At their best, they are at peace with compromises that they’ve made with the powerful forces around them. That’s it, though. Not “happy,” just “O.K.”

Perhaps it’s the model of “happiness” that’s the real issue. Peak happiness happens, thank goodness! It simply never lasts. Feeling good all the time sounds great on paper, but maybe it’s kinda unrealistic. Why not adjust our expectations to fit better with reality? That’s what Cassie et al. finally did on World. How marvelous to have these joyful bursts from time to time. Working toward a sense of general wellbeing, not the vanishing ecstatic extreme, is my goal. I get the idea that Chalker thought so too. If that’s true, than at least we can safely put Mervyn’s fear of the end of progress to rest. It will never stop because permanent ecstatic happiness is always out of reach. That’s not as gloomy as it sounds. Personally I enjoy things more when they’re mixed with things that are less exciting. It’s the variety that makes stuff interesting.

Reading this three volume novel made me very happy, at least for a while. The story’s disturbing but also thrilling and thought provoking. That good feeling is already fading and I only finished the third novel last night. I suppose that I’ll have to start on something else soon to get that literary “rush” once again. But I’m still feeling fine right now.

{ 0 comments }

surviving the Eighties on Jack Chalker’s Well World

January 7, 2010

Has anyone out there in the greater blog-i-verse ever heard of Jack Chalker? He saved my sanity in the 1980’s. I was a dorky, shy, hypersensitive high school kid then; confused about a lot of things: adulthood, sexuality, my relationship to the world beyond the cookie cutter NoVA suburb that I grew up in, you [...]

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Read the full article →